Blog

Choosing a Service Format That Actually Fits

How to Draft Effective Non-Disclosure Agreements

October 15, 2024 · 8 min read

Confidentiality clauses are the cornerstone of any international negotiation. Without precise wording, the protection of sensitive information can vanish as soon as a conflict arises. This article examines the essential elements that every corporate lawyer must consider when drafting a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) in cross-border operations.

Definition of Confidential Information

The first challenge is to define what constitutes confidential information. In international contracts, the definition must be broad enough to cover technical, financial, and commercial data, but without falling into vagueness that renders it unenforceable. We recommend including an illustrative list and expressly excluding information that is already public domain or that the recipient can demonstrate they knew beforehand.

Duration of the Obligation

The term of confidentiality varies by jurisdiction and sector. While in Argentina the periods typically range from three to five years, in Brazil it is common to extend them up to ten years for industrial secrets. The drafter must assess the business lifecycle and the sensitivity of the information to set a reasonable term, keeping in mind that excessively long periods may be declared void by courts.

Permitted Exceptions

Every confidentiality clause must include exceptions: disclosures required by law, court or regulatory orders, and communications to legal and financial advisors bound by a duty of confidentiality. In the Andean region, the regulations of the Andean Community also require notifying the other party before any mandatory disclosure, so that they can seek a protective measure.

Jurisdiction and Applicable Law

The choice of forum is critical. A contract between an Argentine and a Mexican company may opt for New York or English law, but the cost of litigation in those jurisdictions can be prohibitive. A practical alternative is to subject the NDA to the law of the disclosing party's country and choose arbitration at the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) seated in Buenos Aires or São Paulo.

Common Mistakes That Invalidate Protection

Among the most frequent errors are: not clearly defining the purpose of the disclosure, omitting the obligation to return or destroy the information upon termination of the agreement, and not including a confidentiality clause for the recipient's employees and subcontractors. Each of these oversights can be exploited in litigation to undermine liability.

Drafting an international NDA requires knowledge of local legislation and industry business practices. A well-structured agreement not only protects information but also builds trust between the parties and facilitates the negotiation of more complex contracts.

Follow-up

Questions Clients Ask Before Starting

A direct look at the real concerns that arise before signing a legal advisory agreement.


When a corporate client first approaches, they usually have more doubts than certainties. It's not about mistrust, but prudence. In over fifteen years handling international contracts and patent registrations, I've seen that the questions repeat themselves with a precision that deserves to be addressed separately.

The first issue is usually about the scope of the service. It's not enough to say "legal advisory." The client wants to know if we cover the full drafting of the contract, negotiation with the counterparty, and eventual defense in case of a dispute. My answer is always the same: it depends on the assignment, but I offer a phase-by-phase breakdown so there are no surprises.

Another recurring question is about confidentiality. In a B2B environment, the information shared during due diligence can be strategic. I explain that all documents are handled under non-disclosure agreements and that the encrypted portal area allows for secure exchange without relying on open emails.

They also ask about timelines. I don't promise unrealistic dates. If it's an industrial patent in Argentina, the substantive examination can take between 18 and 24 months. For an international licensing contract, the drafting and review time is usually three to four weeks, provided the parties respond promptly.

Finally, there's the question about cost. I don't give generic budgets. Each case has different variables: technical complexity of the invention, number of jurisdictions involved, client urgency. I prefer to schedule a brief conversation to understand the context and then present a tailored proposal.

These questions are not obstacles; they are signs that the client is making the decision seriously. Answering them clearly and without beating around the bush is the foundation of a professional relationship that works.

BS

Beatrice Stevens

Corporate Attorney · Intellectual Property and International Contracts

Gutiérrez 8853 · (561) 546-7796 · info@beatricestevens.com

Cookie settings

We use cookies to keep the site stable, remember basic preferences, and understand which pages are useful. You can accept, reject, or review the settings before continuing.